Ambimat GroupAmbimatAmbiSecureeSIM InitiativeEngineering BlogAhmedabad · India · Est. 1981
HISTORICAL ARCHIVE · Originally published June 1, 2021
Archive

SMS-based OTP Authentication and Its Disadvantages

Why SMS-based one-time passwords are no longer a defensible second factor — SIM-swap attacks, SS7 weaknesses, phishing-prone OTP relay, and the hardware-rooted alternatives.

This is an earlier piece from the AmbiSecure engineering archive. Where the field has moved on, the link above points to current coverage of the same topic.

SMS-based one-time passwords were a useful upgrade from passwords. They are no longer a defensible second factor. SIM-swap fraud, SS7 interception, phishing-prone OTP relay, and the broader telecom-trust assumption all push enterprises and regulators toward hardware-rooted alternatives — particularly in markets like India where SMS-OTP is still the default second factor across banking, government, and telco.

Multi-Factor Authentication

A simple password doesn't cut it for most systems. MFA grants access only after presenting at least two pieces of evidence:

  • Knowledge Factor — Something you know (password, PIN, answer)
  • Possession Factor — Something you have (token, card, mobile device)
  • Inherence Factor — Something you are (biometric data)

MFA-enabled accounts require a second code generated through an alternative medium in addition to a traditional password.

SMS-based OTP Authentication and Its Disadvantages

Smartphones give us access to numerous services online — banking, shopping, social media, etc. This rise in connectivity gave rise to data theft. To overcome breaches, many providers introduced SMS-based OTP authentication. The concept is to enter an OTP received on your mobile to verify credentials. But SMS-based OTP authentication can also be compromised.

Disadvantages of SMS based OTP Authentication

  1. Low level of security for a Second Factor Authentication Method — SMS OTP is more like a two-step verification because you simply receive a message on your phone. Messages can be intercepted and copied by malware.
  2. Unsecure to Open Networks — Open or unsecured networks are the lurking ground for hackers (Man-In-The-Middle). Uploading malicious software becomes easy.
  3. Unencrypted Messages — SMS OTP is plain text passing through channels with weak security. SIM swap attacks let hackers obtain new SIMs and receive OTPs.
  4. Privacy and Security of Message not Guaranteed — Most network operators cannot provide proper security measures.

Why is SMS-based 2FA still so popular?

  • Original assumptions about cellular network/handset security no longer hold; specialized Trojans hijack mobile phones.
  • OTP requires reliable cell signal and battery life.
  • Occasional SMS delivery failures.
  • 3rd-party messaging providers often incur per-text charges.

Going beyond SMS authentication

FIDO2 is a standard that uses public-key cryptography to protect from phishing — the only phishing-proof factor available. AmbiSecure key and card combine hardware-based authentication and public key cryptography. AmbiSecure helps organizations accelerate to a password-less future via FIDO2 protocol. The key/card requires no battery or network connectivity.

About Ambimat Electronics

Close to 4 decades of design experience. Solutions include AmbiPay, AmbiPower, AmbiCon, AmbiSecure, AmbiSense, AmbiAutomation across smartwatches, smart homes, medical, robotics, retail, pubs/brewery, and security.

References

  • https://fossbytes.com/heard-blue-screen-of-death-there-are-black-red-green-white-purple-gray-yellow-brown-also/
  • https://blog.securedtouch.com/digital-officers-guide-multifactor-authentication

Looking for the current take?

This archive piece reflects thinking from June 1, 2021. For a current-generation treatment of the same topic, see our modern coverage.

Read the current article

Browse more historical AmbiSecure writing.

The full archive lists everything we have published, with the modern-equivalent counterpart linked wherever one exists.

Open archive